Welcome

WELCOME TO OUR BLOG. VISIT OUR BLOG FOR REGULAR UPDATES ON INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS, NCLAT JUDGEMENTS & NCLT JUDGEMENTS ON IBC

Sunday, August 9, 2020

Changes in appointment rules of Authorised Representative to represent financial creditors in a class

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Changes in appointment rules of Authorised Representative to represent financial creditors in a class

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2020.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) envisages appointment of an authorised representative (AR) by the Adjudicating Authority to represent financial creditors in a class, like allottees under a real estate project, in the committee of creditors. For this purpose, the Regulations require the interim resolution professional to offer a choice of three Insolvency Professionals (IP) in the public announcement, and the creditors in a class to choose one of them to act as their authorised representative. The amendment made to the Regulations today provides that the three IPs offered by the interim resolution professional must be from the State or Union Territory, which has the highest number of creditors in the class as per records of the corporate debtor. This will facilitate ease of coordination and communication between the AR and the creditors in the class he represents. 

The Regulations currently envisage that the authorised representative shall seek voting instructions from creditors in a class at two stages, namely, (i) before the meeting; and (ii) after circulation of minutes of meeting. The amendment made to the Regulations today provides that the authorised representative shall seek voting instructions only after circulation of minutes of meeting and vote accordingly. He shall, however, circulate the agenda, and may seek preliminary views of creditors in the class before the meeting, to enable him to effectively participate in the meeting. 

The Regulations provide that the committee of creditors shall evaluate all compliant resolution plans as per evaluation matrix to identify the best of them and may approve it. The amendment made to the Regulations today provides that after evaluation of all compliant resolution plans as per evaluation matrix, the committee of creditors shall vote on all compliant resolution plans simultaneously. The resolution plan, which receives the highest votes, but not less than sixty-six percent of voting share, shall be considered as approved.

Click Here for download of Amended CIRP Regulations


Compiled By:


Team Apna IP Consultant


Disclaimer: The Purposes of this article is knowledge sharing among the users while the information is believed to be accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief. We do not make any representation or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. We accept no responsibilities for any errors it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise or for any loss, howsoever caused or sustained, by the person who relies upon it. 

  

Corporate Person may replace the liquidator by appointing another insolvency professional as liquidator

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Corporate Person may replace the liquidator by appointing another insolvency professional as liquidator


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Voluntary Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2017 

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Voluntary Liquidation Process) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2020. 


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 enables a corporate person to initiate voluntary liquidation process if it has no debt or it will be able to pay its debts fully from the proceeds of the assets. The corporate person appoints an insolvency professional to conduct the voluntary liquidation process by a resolution of members or partners, or contributories, as the case may be. However, there can be situations which may require appointment of another resolution professional as the liquidator. The amendment made to the Regulations today provides that the corporate person may replace the liquidator by appointing another insolvency professional as liquidator by a resolution of members or partners, or contributories, as the case may be.  

Click Here for download of Amended Voluntary Liquidation Process Regulations


Compiled By:


Team Apna IP Consultant


Disclaimer: The Purposes of this article is knowledge sharing among the users while the information is believed to be accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief. We do not make any representation or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. We accept no responsibilities for any errors it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise or for any loss, howsoever caused or sustained, by the person who relies upon it. 

IBBI - Fixation of Fees Payable to Liquidators

www.apnaipconsultant.com

IBBI - Fixation of Fees Payable to Liquidators


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016


The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2020.


The Regulations require the committee of creditors to fix the fee payable to the liquidator.
Where the fee has not been fixed by the committee of creditors, the Regulations provide for a
fee as a percentage of the amount realised and of the amount distributed by the liquidator. There have been instances where a liquidator realises the amount while another liquidator distributes the same to stakeholders. The amendment made to the Regulations today clarifies that where a liquidator realises any amount, but does not distribute the same, he shall be entitled to a fee corresponding to the amount realised by him. Likewise, where a liquidator distributes any amount, which is not realised by him, he shall be entitled to a fee corresponding to the amount distributed by him.


click here for download amended liquidation process regulations in PDF


Compiled By:


Team Apna IP Consultant


Disclaimer: The Purposes of this article is knowledge sharing among the users while the information is believed to be accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief. We do not make any representation or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. We accept no responsibilities for any errors it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise or for any loss, howsoever caused or sustained, by the person who relies upon it. 

Thursday, August 6, 2020

INITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS BY FINANCIAL CREDITORS U/S 7 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016

www.apnaipconsultant.com

INITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS BY FINANCIAL CREDITORS U/S 7 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016

 FINANCIAL CREDITOR : SECTION 5(7)

financial creditor” means any person to whom a financial debt is owed and includes a person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or transferred to;


 FINANCIAL DEBT : SECTION 5(8)

  • financial debt” means a debt alongwith interest, if any, which is disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money and includes–
    1. money borrowed against the payment of interest;
    2. any amount raised by acceptance under any acceptance credit facility or its de- materialised equivalent;
    3. any amount raised pursuant to any note purchase facility or the issue of bonds, notes, debentures, loan stock or any similar instrument;
    4. the amount of any liability in respect of any lease or hire purchase contract which is deemed as a finance or capital lease under the Indian Accounting Standards or such other accounting standards as may be prescribed;
    5. receivables sold or discounted other than any receivables sold on non-recourse basis;
    6. any amount raised under any other transaction, including any forward sale or purchase agreement, having the commercial effect of a borrowing;

[Explanation. -For the purposes of this sub-clause, -

      1. any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project shall be deemed to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing; and
      2. the expressions, “allottee” and “real estate project” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in clauses (d) and (zn) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016);]

g.      any derivative transaction entered into in connection with protection against or benefit from fluctuation in any rate or price and for calculating the value of any derivative transaction, only the market value of such transaction shall be taken into account;

h.      any counter-indemnity obligation in respect of a guarantee, indemnity, bond, documentary letter of credit or any other instrument issued by a bank or financial institution;

i.        the amount of any liability in respect of any of the guarantee or indemnity for any of the items referred to in sub-clause (a) to (h) of this clause;

 

PERSONS WHO MAY INITIATE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS : SECTION 6

Where any corporate debtor commits a default, a financial creditor, an operational creditor or the corporate debtor itself may initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of such corporate debtor in the manner as provided under this Chapter.


INITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS BY FINANCIAL CREDITOR: SECTION 7

 

SECTION 7 (1)

A financial creditor either by itself or jointly with 1[other financial creditors, or any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, as may be notified by the Central Government] may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority when a default has occurred.

 

Proviso:

[Provided that for the financial creditors, referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of sub- section (6A) of section 21, an application for initiation corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor shall be filed jointly by not less than one hundred of such creditors in the same class or not less than ten per cent. of the total number of such creditors in the same class, whichever is less:

Provided further that for financial creditors who are allottees under a real estate project, an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor shall be filed jointly by not less than one hundred of such allottees under the same real estate project or not less than ten per cent. of the total number of such allottees under the same real estate project, whichever is less:

Provided also that where an application for initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor has been filed by a financial creditor referred to in the first or second provisos and has not been admitted by the Adjudicating Authority before the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020, such application shall be modified to comply with the requirements of the first or second provisos as the case may be within thirty days of the commencement of the said Act, failing which the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn before its admission.]

 

Explanation. - For the purposes of this sub-section, a default includes a default in respect of a financial debt owed not only to the applicant financial creditor but to any other financial creditor of the corporate debtor.

SECTION 7 (2)

The financial creditor shall make an application under sub-section (1) in such form and manner and accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.

 

SECTION 7 (3)

The financial creditor shall, along with the application furnish -

(a) record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified;

(b) t h e name of the resolution professional proposed to act as an interim resolution professional; and

(c) any other information as may be specified by the Board.

 

 

SECTION 7 (4)

The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), ascertain the existence of a default from the records of an information utility or on the basis of other evidence furnished by the financial creditor under sub-section (3):


[Provided that if the Adjudicating Authority has not ascertained the existence of default and passed an order under sub-section (5) within such time, it shall record its reasons in writing for the same.]

 

SECTION 7 (5)

Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that –

(a)     a default has occurred and the application under sub-section (2) is complete, and there is no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may, by order, admit such application; or


(b)  default has not occurred or the application under sub-section (2) is incomplete or any disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may, by order, reject such application:


Provided that the Adjudicating Authority shall, before rejecting the application under clause (b) of sub-section (5), give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.

 

SECTION 7 (6)

The corporate insolvency resolution process shall commence from the date of admission of the application under sub-section (5).

 

SECTION 7 (7)

The Adjudicating Authority shall communicate-

(a)   the order under clause (a) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor and the corporate debtor;

 

(b)  the order under clause (b) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor,


within seven days of admission or rejection of such application, as the case may be.

 


Compiled By:


Team Apna IP Consultant


Disclaimer: The Purposes of this article is knowledge sharing among the users while the information is believed to be accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief. We do not make any representation or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. We accept no responsibilities for any errors it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise or for any loss, howsoever caused or sustained, by the person who relies upon it. 

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Once an insolvency professional is appointed to manage the company, the erstwhile directors who are no longer in management, obviously cannot maintain an appeal on behalf of the company

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Supreme Court Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_SC Orders, Once an insolvency professional is appointed to manage the company, the erstwhile directors who are no longer in management, obviously cannot maintain an appeal on behalf of the company

SC - Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank.pdf


The time limit prescribed in IBC, 2016 for admitting or rejecting a petition or initiation of CIRP is directory for courts and time limit for removal of objections is mandatory for applicants

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Supreme Court Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_SC Orders, The time limit prescribed in IBC, 2016 for admitting or rejecting a petition or initiation of CIRP is directory for courts and time limit for removal of objections is mandatory for applicants

SC - Surendra Trading Company Vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Co. Ltd. & Ors..pdf


Sunday, August 2, 2020

IBC is not a recovery forum and the IBC provisions cannot be invoked if there is existence of real pre-existing dispute

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Supreme Court Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_SC Orders, IBC is not a recovery forum and the IBC provisions cannot be invoked if there is existence of real pre-existing dispute

Transmission Corporation Of Andhra Pradesh Limited Vs Equipment Conductors 34994_2018_Judgement_23-Oct-2018_2018-10-23 22_58_08.pdf


NCLAT opens window for the Corporate Debtor, to exit the CIRP, and allow to make an out of court settlement with its creditors.

www.apnaipconsultant.com

NCLAT Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_NCLAT Orders, NCLAT opens window for the Corporate Debtor, to exit the CIRP, and allow to make an out of court settlement with its creditors.

In the matter of Vivek Bansal Vs. Burda Druck India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. CA(AT)(Ins)No. 552 of 2020


High Court ought not to have proceeded with the auction of the property of the Corporate Debtor, once the proceedings under the IBC had commenced, and an Order declaring moratorium was passed by the NCLT

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Supreme Court Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_SC Orders, High Court ought not to have proceeded with the auction of the property of the Corporate Debtor, once the proceedings under the IBC had commenced, and an Order declaring moratorium was passed by the NCLT

In the matter of Anand Rao Korada Resolution Professional Vs. Varsha Fabrics (P) Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal Nos. 8800-8801 of 2019.pdf


Expenses fixed by adjudicating authority will be borne by creditor who moves the application

www.apnaipconsultant.com

Supreme Court Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_SC Orders, expenses fixed by adjudicating authority will be borne by creditor who moves the application, if no COC is constituted

In the matter of S3 Electricals and Electronics Private Limited Vs. Brian Lau & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 103-2018


Saturday, August 1, 2020

A Corporate Debtor in respect of whom a liquidation order has been made is not entitled to make application to initiate CIRP against other Corporate Debtor

www.apnaipconsultant.com

NCLAT Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_NCLAT Orders, A Corporate Debtor in respect of whom a liquidation order has been made is not entitled to make application to initiate CIRP against other Corporate Debtor, section 11 of IBC, 2016

In the matter of Abhay N. Manudhane Vs. Gupta Coal India Pvt. Ltd. CA(AT)(Insolvency)No.786 of 2019


ED has no jurisdiction to attach the property of the Corporate Debtor which is undergoing CIRP without prior approval of the Appellate Tribunal

www.apnaipconsultant.com

NCLAT Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_NCLAT Orders, ED has no jurisdiction to attach the property of the Corporate Debtor which is undergoing CIRP without prior approval of the Appellate Tribunal

In the matter of JSW Steel Limited Vs. Mahender Kumar Khandelwal CA(AT) (Ins) No. 957 of 2019.pdf


Successful Resolution Applicant can not be burdened for past and unclaimed liabilities after approved Resolution Plan

www.apnaipconsultant.com

NCLAT Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_NCLAT Orders, Successful Resolution Applicant can not be burdened for past and unclaimed liabilities after approved Resolution Plan

In the matter of State of Haryana Vs. Uttam Strips Ltd. and Ors. CA(AT)(Ins)No. 319 of 2020.pdf


COC has the requisite power to replace the IRP with Proposed RP even in the subsequent meetings if not replaced by RP in first meeting of COC

www.apnaipconsultant.com

NCLAT Orders, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Landmark Judgments_NCLAT Orders, COC has the requisite power to replace the IRP with Proposed RP even in the subsequent meetings if not replaced by RP in first meeting of COC, Section 22 read with section 27 of the IBC,2016

In the matter of Bank of India Vs. Ms. Nithin Nutritions Pvt. Ltd. CA(AT)(Ins)No. 497-501of 2020.pdf


CA IP MUKESH MITTAL